Interview with Midas Gold CEO Stephen Quin: the Stibnite Gold Project

Interview with Midas Gold CEO Stephen Quin: the Stibnite Gold Project


Gerardo Del Real: This is Gerardo Del Real
with the Outsider Club. Joining me today is president and CEO of Midas
Gold, Mr. Stephen Quin. Stephen Quin: Thanks, Gerardo. Gerardo Del Real: Stephen, thank you for joining
us. Stephen Quin: You’re welcome. Gerardo Del Real: We’re here at the New Orleans
investment conference, cautious optimism? A little more foot traffic? Stephen Quin: Yeah, definitely a better tone
than it has been for certainly the last two or three years. Gerardo Del Real: Excellent. Stephen Quin: So that’s encouraging. Gerardo Del Real: Sure. For people who aren’t familiar with the Midas
story, can you share with us some of the news here in the past six months, which has been
fast and furious. Can we backtrack a little bit maybe to the
big financing with Mr. John Paulson and talk a bit about that? Stephen Quin: Sure. If you go back a couple of years ago we’ve
been in a holding pattern because we had limited funding available, so not able to push forward. But in March this year we did a fifty-five
million dollar Canadian financing, which was fully back stopped by John Paulson and Co. Our existing share holders had the right to
take out up to about twenty million of their financing, which they did, so that was over
subscribed. Paulson and Co. ended up with about $35 million
of that financing. Having that $55 million financing completed
was definitely the driver that’s now allowed us to get on and move the project forward. Gerardo Del Real: As we know in the junior
mining world, one of the things that I preach at the Outsider Club is you want to make sure
that the share structure’s intact and you have great long term share holders and that
you have a project that’s de-risked. You’ve gone through some of the most grilling,
due diligence processes of any project that I know. I know Teck has been at the project, Franco
Nevada has been at the project, the Paulson Group has been at the project. Can you share with us some of the details
about how that went? Stephen Quin: Sure. Because these fundings were raised during
very difficult times, people were very careful with their money and they had a lot of different
options to choose from. They did a lot of due diligence, the Teck
process to probably about five months to work, sorry, the Franco Nevada process took about
five months to work through, they brought a whole team of people, did a lot of due diligence,
went to site, met different regulators, met community leaders, things like that, to really
verify that they were comfortable that we could move the project forward. Similarly with the Paulson process we’ve met
with them for about two years off and on discussing the project and they eventually came to site,
did their due diligence, brought a team of people, met the lieutenant governor of the
state, met mayors of local towns, a variety of that type of thing. They’re not just looking at the hard things,
the drill holes and things like that. They’re looking at your ability to move the
project forward. That was an extensive process as well, it
took us over six months to get that transaction announced. A lot of it was focused on due diligence and
making sure that we had the right capital structure that worked for them and worked
for us to move the company forward. We’re very happy with the conclusion, the
key point is that they gave us the money that we were able to start moving the project forward
again instead of just being in a holding pattern. Gerardo Del Real: Excellent. You mentioned something very interesting,
you mentioned the fact that they did a lot of due diligence with the locals and I think
Midas has taken a very unique approach. Can you talk a little bit about how you’ve
engaged the local community? Because the board recently had an announcement
that was made and you also have Midas Gold local, right? Can you share the details behind that approach? Stephen Quin: Sure, if you step back a couple
of years, we started or have been on that now almost three years. We looked at it and said, we’ve got the typical
old mining company approach where we’re Vancouver based, we’ve got people who aren’t from Idaho
on the board, et cetera. We started to look at and say, well really
what we need to have to gain a social license to operate is local participation. We started a process which has been completed
now, where initially we brought two very prominent Idaho directors onto the board, Keith Allred
who is a leading conservationist who ran to be the Democratic for governor of Idaho. He came on our board and a lady by the name
of Laurel Sayer, who is also a leading conservationist, came on the board as well. She worked for the Idaho Coalition Land Trust,
which is basically groups that buy land to preserve it. It’s a very preservation type of focus. It took quite a long time to get them onboard,
due diligence was involved in that as well, of a different nature, how were people going
to consider this project and them being involved in it. We got that done a couple of years ago and
then around the same time we also created an Idaho subsidiary where it basically is
the operating entity for the company. The listed company now provides the cash to
the operating company which does all of the work. All the employees and so on are based in the
Idaho company. We created and independent board on that company,
a lot of companies have subsidiaries, but we wanted a completely different approach
so it has a board of six people and five of those six are not Midas people. We only had one Midas person on that board
and the other five were completely independent. Four were leading local residents in the county
where we operate and one was an operational fellow out of Denver. We created that structure and so they’ve been
very involved in insuring the project from the inside as opposed to the outside is doing
what it’s supposed to be doing and what we’re doing is correct. Just recently, in September just ahead of
filing the permit application, we made another change where we asked Laurel Sayer if would
come off our board of directors at the parent level and become president and CEO of the
operating entity in Idaho. This is a very different approach because
now we a leading conservationist who is leading the permitting of a mining project in Idaho. Obviously, she’s had two years to get familiar
with us, our project, what we’re planning to do and she’s very passionate that there
are projects that can work and that this is one that should be an example because of the
brownfield nature of the site and the ability to clean it all up. She moved off the Midas Gold Corp, the parent
board, to become CEO of the operating entity in Idaho and we replaced her with a fellow
by the name of Michael Bogart, Michael Bogart ran region ten of the EPA for the US government. He was counsel to the Secretary of the Interior
federally on regulatory matters relating to promoting all types of different projects,
not just mining. He was very heavily involved in a major war
to rights allocation up in northern Idaho, so a variety of different things like that
and a very collaborative person trying and reach across the aisle or reach across the
communities into different groups and very successful in doing that. We’ve already strengthened our presence. He’s also an Idaho resident, so we have a
very strong Idaho presence. In fact, we have a majority of Idaho people
that run the company day to day. It’s a very different approach, having conservationists
leading the permitting of a mine. Gerardo Del Real: Absolutely. How important, you recently filed the PRO,
Plan of Restoration Operations, how important has the local input been in preempting a lot
of the problems that the typical project would face. What struck me when I visited the project
was how engaged the locals were and how engaged you were with them in preempting a lot of
the problems that typically you hear about later on in the process after the application’s
been filed. Can you share a little bit about how that’s
worked? Stephen Quin: We prepared our draft permit
application late last year. We weren’t able to file it at that time because
we didn’t have the cash in place. Rather than just wasting time and doing nothing,
we said why don’t we take a draft of this permit application out to different community
groups, to regulators, to NGOs, and different groups and have them look at it and critique
it if they were willing to do that. A variety of groups were willing to do that. Some of them spent a lot of time and effort
going through it. It doesn’t mean, and we’re not saying that
that means they’re not going to have comments later. But what it should do is short circuit that
process to have what we actually filed, by the time we got that process completed, it’s
something much closer to what they’re expecting to see, and questions that they had already
answered, points that they thought we missed or we didn’t address it in enough detail,
we’ve added all that type of information. It should result in a much more complete document
that goes to through the review process more efficiently and more effectively. Time is money, so we may have lost some in
the beginning, but we may have gained it in the end by going through that process and
it was very extensive. I think we had over sixty meetings this year
on it, we had over fifty meetings last year. Some of those meetings were two or three reviews
of successive drafts. Well there’s your comments, well here’s the
next version, did we add it or address your comments? It should all help the process of moving it
forward relatively quickly. Gerardo Del Real: Wonderful. Another unique aspect of Midas is that you’re
going through the permitting process, and here comes the fun part, you already have
over 6.5 million ounces across all categories. You have excellent metallurgy, you have phenomenal
exploration potential, and you’re drilling again. As you know, one of my favorite things in
this business is get out there and drill and see what’s out there and see if you can add
value via the drill bit. I’m excited for results, I know you’ve been
drilling, where is that now? Stephen Quin: Sure, there’s really two types
of opportunities. One we went from preliminary economic assessment
to pre-feasibility study. One big difference between those two studies
is you cannot use inferred resources in a pre-feasibility study. Between the two studies about a million ounces
disappeared from the mine plan by the time it got to pre-feasibility study. We talk about this in the pre-feasibility
study, that those ounces are not excluded for economic reasons. We use the pre-feasibility study economics,
those ounces are still there, so it’s really a question of confidence. The obvious thing is convert them from inferred
to indicated so now you can use them in the mine plan. Part one of what we’re aiming to do with that
drilling is to convert the inferred from inferred to indicated. Therefore, they’ll be used in the mine plan
for the feasibility study. That drilling is underway and we’re doing
that in a variety of parts of the different deposits, but really focused on Yellow Pine
and to some extent Hangar Flats because there’s were the biggest bang for the buck we saw
looking at all the different options out there. The second type of opportunity is there are
drill hole intercepts which didn’t make resource, which are sitting in and around the pits. These are ounces that aren’t in any category. They’re not part of the six point six million
ounces we have, but they’re providing opportunity to add additional ounces. Obviously you just don’t want to add ounces
for the sake of adding ounces. What you want to do is add ounces that add
value. The way they’ll add the most value is if they’re
so valuable they come very early in the mine life. You don’t care about something way down in
the bottom of the pit, because that’s going to be many years in the future, what you care
about is something that maybe comes in year one or two or three or something like that. There’s a number of targets like that. Probably the highest profile one is this area
called Yellow Pine Northeast, which is a bit of a misnomer because it’s not actually part
of the Yellow Pine deposit, it’s on the other side of a big fault in a different type of
rock. What intrigued us about it is in the 1930s
a hole was drilled there where there was just under six grams of tonne gold (6 g/t) over
forty-five feet, which is very nice grade. That’s three times the grade we’re planning
to mine in the reserve pit. The question obviously was ‘was there more?’ In 2014 we drilled a few extra holes in that
area and we tapped into an area about a hundred meters along the strike from that hole where
we drilled about seventy meters or two hundred feet, over two hundred feet for five point
four grams of tonne (5.4 g/t) gold. That’s still over two and a half times the
grade of our reserve and over a significant thickness. The big question now is well how much of it
is there? Is there enough to affect the mine plan? We’ve drilled another hole in to that area
which has been completed and has been sent for assay, we don’t have any results yet,
so we’ll just have to wait and see how they com out. It’s a hard area to assess because when we
drilled that area in 2014 you really couldn’t see the mineralization the way you could in
the other deposits where it’s much more obvious. The question on this one is how does it grade? And if it maintains those very high grades
then it becomes quite intriguing. That’s not the only opportunities like that. There’s a similar area, Hangar Flats, where
we have intercepts of three to four grams gold and one to two percent antimony that’s
just sitting on the side of the pit. Again, it doesn’t make it into the mine plan
because it doesn’t have the continuity that we need. You see the very good grade intercepts, so
we have some holes planned there probably early next year that we’ll lay into drilling
in that area and try and bring that into the plan. It’s those kinds of things where they’re exceptionally
better grade than what we’re already planning to mine where the real bang for the buck is
in improving the value of the project. Gerardo Del Real: Significant opportunities
to hopefully increase the net present value. You still know where those million ounces
are, you haven’t lost them. Stephen Quin: Nope they’re still there. Gerardo Del Real: Still have the antimony,
you haven’t lost the antimony. Stephen Quin: Right. Gerardo Del Real: Excellent. Stephen Quin: The aim is to get it back into
the mine plan and show the feasibility study having significantly more value than we showed
in the PFS. That’s the point of PFSs, pre-feasibility
studies, they’re aimed to say okay, here’s where you are now and here’s what you need
to do before you go to feasibility study. Now we’re doing what we said we were going
to do in the pre-feasibility study and the aim is to bring that value back to the table
so when we get to feasibility study it’s part of the economics. Gerardo Del Real: Assays maybe next couple
of weeks? Next month? Stephen Quin: We’ll see how quickly they turn
around. Surprise is that the labs are very busy, so
there’s a lot of people drilling. The resurgence the industry, the labs haven’t
ramped up people as much as they might have done, so we’re seeing maybe a month turn around. That’s not that far away, maybe by Thanksgiving. Gerardo Del Real: Wonderful. You have a world class resource, you have
long term committed shareholders, cash in the bank stands at approximately how much? Stephen Quin: About $40 million at the end
of Q2. Gerardo Del Real: Assays are pending. Stephen Quin: Assays are pending. Gerardo Del Real: Wonderful. Steve, thank you so much. Appreciate your time. Stephen Quin: Thank you, Gerardo. You’re welcome.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*